Read Only Memory: On Chris Markers Immemory Project (Filmmaker magazine, Summer 2022)
“I'll find you,” Chris Marker told Damon Krukowski and Naomi Yang. The
first time they met—New Year's Day, 1999, at the Café de Flore in
Paris—they had no idea what he looked like until he beckoned to them.
There weren’t photos of him anywhere; he'd send illustrations of his
cat, Guillaume-en-Égypte, if anyone asked for a picture. Krukowski and
Yang wished to collaborate on an English language edition of the
director's CD-ROM project, Immemory. Marker could be difficult to reach
but he liked musicians and made time for the duo—formerly of Galaxie
500—who have performed as Damon & Naomi since 1991.
Marker was sitting outside in perfect anonymity in the middle of
Saint-Germain-des-Prés. “It was like a spy movie,” Krukowski told me.
Marker handed them spools of old wire recordings and asked whether the
pair could help deliver them to someone in the United States who could
transfer the audio. “I need you to take very good care of these,” he
told them, stressing how important the spools were. The Cambridge-based
musicians agreed to deliver the recordings, which involved no small
fuss at the airport—Yang pleaded with airport security staff not to
send the spools through the X-ray machine—and “very Third Man” calls to
arrange the pickup around New York. Once the spools changed hands,
Marker contacted them by fax. Thus began their involvement with
Immemory, which has lasted more than two decades in formats both
digital and analog.
First released in 1997, Immemory is a memoir in digital bricolage.
Marker’s recollections of family and childhood are arranged alongside
commentary on art, Proust, Hitchcock and references to technologies
like Singer sewing machines and Rolleiflex cameras. Guillaume the cat
acts as the CD-ROM tour guide in playful interruptions and comic
book-style dialogue bubbles. The images are pixelated, the sound
effects tinny, but these limitations to the form—apparent even back in
the ’90s—are the work’s signature, along with the pleasantly meandering
pace as the user skips through collages of superimposed images and
Marker's beautifully written texts.
Marker built Immemory on an Apple computer with software developed for
schoolchildren called HyperStudio. It looks somewhat like a website,
but the hypertext architecture is unique, and the CD-ROM has been
plagued with compatibility issues since its release. Centre Pompidou,
which produced the work, hired a digital agency early on to adapt it
for Microsoft computers, but Marker—unwilling to make changes to its
functionality—sparred with them. For the English-language edition
released in 2002, Yang had to rebuild the CD-ROM architecture from
scratch, retracing all the hyperlink pathways between images and texts.
In 2008, Krukowski and Yang’s publishing company Exact Change
remastered Immemory for OS X; in 2011, the Pompidou created a version
of it for the web using now-obsolete Adobe Flash. It’s been a
“quicksand jigsaw puzzle,” Yang told me.
Immemory was the first non-print project for Exact Change, which
ordinarily publishes paperbacks by avant-garde authors like Denton
Welch, Unica Zürn and Fernando Pessoa. The next version, which they are
working on now, will be what Marker called his “Gutenberg edition.”
Paper, after all, is “way more permanent than Mac OS 7.5,” Krukowski
said. “If it’s locked in a secret format, that didn’t seem so tragic
to” Marker, but this is the best chance for Immemory to survive. Yang,
the project designer, is thinking through the technical and conceptual
challenges of this particular adaptation process: is a link necessarily
a page break? How much repetition is necessary to faithfully transfer
this work? The project's model is Julio Cortázar's 1963 Hopscotch, a
novel that can be read in various sequences of pages.
Marker thought of himself as a “Sunday programmer,” and Yang remembers,
with a laugh, that his experiments with computers “didn't always work
so well.” She’d often open emails from him with bootleg software
attached. “It was something incredibly buggy. Or it would freeze my
computer. He got it off of some place on the internet or some hacker.”
But Marker was eager to experiment, this was apparent throughout his
career, including his best known films, Sans Soleil (1983) and La Jetée
(1962)—the former a feature shot entirely with a silent film camera,
the latter a short composed of still images. He worked in a variety of
formats—radio plays, novels, documentary—and blended formats, most
notably in his form-expanding work with the “film essay.” Among his
digital projects, there’s DIALECTOR, a chatbot program Marker created
in the 80s. It speaks in an arresting and attentive fashion; for
example, (“PRESS RETURN IF YOU CONSIDER IT'S NONE OF MY BUSINESS ENTER
THE NAME OF SOMEONE YOU LIKE?", “DO YOU KNOW THAT EVERY CAT HAS HIS
GUARDIAN OWL?” The automated dialog he wrote is so present, curious and
intimate that the projects hold up, even today, with chatbots now an
inescapable nuisance of customer service.
A similar playfulness comes through in Marker's 1997 film Level Five,
which begins and ends with a woman speaking to the camera about her
departed lover and the project he left her to complete, a video game
about the Battle of Okinawa. She’s distracted by her memories of the
man who once “wrote at night, late, sitting at the computer, before
[he] logged out.” The actress sits before a computer in the chair in
Marker’s own workspace, where he had worked on Immemory.
Marker—offscreen, naturally—contributes discursive voice-over narration
on Minitel and Otto Preminger’s Laura. Watching the film feels a bit
like browsing the internet in the ’90s, with quick cuts from glitchy
screens to clips of interview subjects, maps and dissolving rudimentary
computer graphics. Level Five conveys a poetic vision of computers as
an imperfect tool for remembering and engaging with history; it
captures the hearts poured out over email, the intimacy shared in
abstraction.
Krukowski and Yang became close with Marker as they worked on Immemory
and would visit him whenever they were in Paris. Marker would always
blend in with the crowd. Even when they attended an exhibition of Agnès
Varda’s work together, no one recognized him. When Marker’s health was
failing and he was no longer able to travel, he invited friends to join
him in a digital sanctuary Max Moswitzer helped develop on Second Life,
a sort of virtual museum in paradise with Guillaume there to greet
visitors. Yang created an avatar, and they'd hold meetings in the
virtual world—“Ouvroir”—to discuss the progress of the Gutenberg
edition of Immemory.
Marker acted the same on Second Life as he did in person, Yang
remembers, and his avatar looked like himself, just younger. When I
told Yang I might have expected him to have a Guillaume avatar in
Second Life, she noted that the companionship of his cat was always
part of the joke. Guillaume is the prankster in his work, and “Chris is
like the straight man.” Through Second Life, Marker made a rare public
appearance at the Harvard Film Archive in 2009, which livestreamed him
from Ouvroir. I was in the audience that night, and while I recall the
physical world crowd was enthusiastic, something unclear to me at the
time seemed awry in the virtual world. A decade later, I learned the
problem was that the Second Life island had become mobbed with the
avatars of strangers, an experience Marker found unnerving—“exactly the
situation that he spent so much effort avoiding in real life,”
Krukowski said.
After Marker’s death in 2012, Exact Change put the Gutenberg edition of
Immemory on hold. They felt an enormous obligation to complete the
project, as promised, but it became tricky without his vision. There
would be no more meetings in Ouvroir.
Several years later, Isabel Ochoa Gold, a doctoral student at UCLA,
read about Immemory in a paper by film scholar Marsha Kinder. She found
the work’s Flash version on Gorgomancy.net, a website Chris Marker set
up with the Pompidou, and wrote to Krukowski and Yang to let them know
that Flash was scheduled to expire at the end of 2020. Through them,
she learned about the “Gutenberg version, which Gold then wrote about
in a feature for Criterion’s Current. Yang invited Gold to join the
project, sending her an antiquated Macintosh found on eBay—a “spry
geezer” Gold told me, and, at present, the only way one can view
Immemory (besides a less-than-engaging four-hour documentation of it on
YouTube or using an emulator). Though she never had a chance to meet
Marker, Gold feels like she’s come to know him through his footprints,
which linger on the internet: “Chris Marker seems to be alive and
impish [online]. I keep finding him with these anonymous YouTube
accounts, and his Second Life island is still there, even though no
one's on there.”
While Exact Change hasn't set a release date for the book yet,
Gold's presence breathes new life in a project that had felt
overwhelming to the publishers. “Isabel appearing, that’s such a Chris
thing,” Yang told me. It’s like Marker had “dreamed [her] up. This
beautiful young woman comes in and is like, ‘I think we can do this.’
And, magically, she has no problem with all the screenshots and
capturing it, and has a great sense of it.” (And she loves cats.)
Many years after they delivered the wire recordings for Marker,
Krukowski and Yang asked what the audio had been on them, anyway.
“Nothing really,” Marker told them, appearing to have forgotten all
about the spools he once handed to them with intense ceremony. “It was
one of those many, many mysteries of Chris,” Krukowski said. And the
personal computer enhanced these mysteries: He could be part of the
world while invisible, in a way, as he made friends with hackers and
Second Life weirdos, freed in online communications from others’
expectations and the weight of his legacy. He could work alone with
sound and images, and do everything with one machine with layers of
anonymity that complemented his elusive nature. On the discs he’d send
to Exact Change, there would be no memory left; he would push the
technology to its limit. Marker once told them, “I've been waiting my
whole life for this machine.”